Search This Blog

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Life and Times of Dennis Crowley

This heartfelt article shows parents that just because your child may prefer video games to homework and athletics it does not mean that they won't have a lasting impact on this ever expanding world. Dennis Crowley is now known for being a Co-Creator and the CEO of Foursquare, but he may be the only CEO that truly believes that life should be a game and not taken so seriously. 

Foursquare is an App available on the iPhone, Android, WebOS, BlackBerry, and Windows Mobile Phones. The purpose of the app is to "Check-In" where you are throughout the day. If you are a user that checks into one place the most then you are awarded "Mayor" of that establishment. Certain restaurants, stores, cafes, and bars award specials for their "Mayors." When you check into a place you can also leave a tip for other users about this place. The app works the best on smart phones because the app can gain access to the location of your phone and show you the places near you in which you can check in.

As you visit new places, stay out late, or visit the same types of places a lot (like art galleries) you receive different badges. Crowley sees these badges as motivation to go out and explore the real word and a way to have fun with your sometimes monotonous daily life. The app's intention is to get people out and about and doing new things. Crowley had ups and downs throughout his adult career before creating the booming success that is Foursquare. Parents should think before forbidding their children to play video game because, for Dennis Crowley, that was where he got all of his inspiration for Foursquare.  

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Second Life is Truly a Second Life

In the novel "New New Media" Paul Levinson spends an entire chapter talking about the phenomenon that is Second Life. Second life is a virtual world where you can create an avatar and live out another life on the net. You use a name different then your own, in most cases, and you can go about life in this virtual world just as you would the real world.

You can do pretty much everything you do in real life on Second Life. Avatars get their hair styled, buy clothes, buy land, dance, and do business.  Paul Levinson's avatar created "Soft Edge Bookstore" a virtual bookstore on Bookstore Island in Second Life. His rent was paid in Linden dollars. The shelves were stacked with all 15 of his books. At the bookstore they were able to read more about his books, and found out how to buy them on amazon. If you bought the books he could tell you where to ship it for an autograph, just like a real bookstore! At the store, his avatar sat on the front porch in his rocking chair.


Linden dollars are the currency that the avatars use on Second Life. Linden dollars are named after Linden Labs who created and continues to develop and administer Second Life. Linden dollars are used to purchase anything from land to a good-looking butt. You can earn them by either purchasing them through PayPal or you can earn them from other residents in Second Life. In December 2008, $5 U.S. dollars purchased about 1,310 L or Linden dollars. Linden dollars works like any worldwide currency.

Second Life is a fascinated social network where you can be a new person and do whatever you want. It is only one tenth as populated as Facebook, but it is definitely going up in popularity. So join Second Life, and have another life separate from your own.  In this article they talk about how second life has significantly improves the quality of life for its disabled users.

In my experience on second life i found it fairly confusing. I talked via chat and not microphone and enjoyed flying around, but found it hard to navigate. I did not like talking to people because I found it creepy to talk to people I didn't even know. I don't intend to further my use of Second Life because I do not believe t was for me, but I could see how people could get addicted to it.

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

MySpace Music

In this blog i would like to discuss the phenomenon that is music on MySpace. In the old days you would have to go to open mic nights and bend over backwards to get your music into the ears of record labels.  Luckily, now with MySpace scouts often search the site for the next big band, allowing there to be another way to make it big. I will now discuss what Paul Levinson found when researching MySpace music in his novel "New New Media."

"Music pages" on MySpace were created in 2005. The purpose of the page is specifically for bands and music artists. The band uploads MP3s of their music and invite people on and off MySpace to come and listen for free. Once you build up an extensive number of friends you can let a record label know how much excitement your band is generating on your MySpace music page. In 2006, MySpace took it a step further by partnering with "SNOCAP"and began offering free samples of music, with a purchase option of the full recording at the price you pick.

Artists like Ebony Moore, James Harris, Truth on Earth, Kate Nash, and popular rapper Sean Kingston were all discovered on MySpace. Sean Kingston was born in Miami, Florida and raised in Kingston Jamaica. He used mMySpace to ignite his career by "hitten up" Jonathan J.R. Rottem, a record producer with a My Space account, with messages from his own MySpace account. He was persistent through MySpace till he got the result he wanted, which was No. 1 songs in the U.S., Canada, and Australia since July 7, 2007. MySpace is a for of new new media that has changed the way music is discovered today. This article discusses the art of finding a band on MySpace and how it is definitely possible to get discovered through MySpace.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Do you dig Digg?

For my entry on Digg i wish to discuss the Digg chapter in Paul Levinson's book "New New Media."The first topic about Digg that Levinson discusses is how a submission becomes "popular." Levinson says that in order to make a Digg article popular it has to receive "an undisclosed number of Diggs, and no minimum number of Buries (Digg keeps this Digg/Bury algorithm secret), the submission becomes 'Popular,' or is put on the front page of Digg," (Levinson, 100). It is important to know that a Digg is what you click when you like they story, and a bury is what you click when you dislike it.

A controversy within Digg is that, like Wikipedia, Digg and Buries are often amassed via deliberate campaigns of readers, instead of being an assessment by an individual reader. From 2007-2009 Digg had a "Shout" option that would allow you to Shout to as many as 200 friends to encourage Diggs or Buries. This option was eliminated in 2009 because the Digg administration was worried about deliberate campaigns on and off the system to Digg or Bury stories. Operations purported to Digg X number of Diggs for a given story for $1 or more per Digg.

Another topic that Levinson discusses is the difference between real like friends and online "Friends." He states that in order to be friends with someone offline it requires you to know a lot about the person, but online that is definitely not the case. However, he does state that they do have a similarity and that is that they both have a similarity or a community of interests. On Digg online Friends often have a similar taste in the stories that they like. Anyone can become a fan of someone else on Digg and this generally means that you like the stories that this person likes or for whatever reason are interested in what they have to say.

This blog overviewed three aspects of Digg, and through this blog i hope that you had a deeper understanding of whether or not you dig Digg. In this article they discuss and analyze the top 100 Digg articles of all time.
  

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Wikipedia, Is It Reliable?

I would like to spend this blog discussing the views that Scott Jaschik has on Wikipedia in his essay "A Stand Against Wikipedia." In this article he discusses weather Wikipedia is a valuable source for college students.

He states that as the online encyclopedia has become more popular, more and more college professors are getting concerned with its accuracy. Middlebury College plans to take their concern to the next level by forbidding students to cite it as a source in essays and other academic work.

The department plans to explain to their students that while the source is convenient, it is not always trustworthy and reliable. They do, however, recognize that it is a good place to go to lead you to good sources, but is not a good source itself.

Middlebury College came to this conclusion after seeing students cite incorrect information on essays and tests from Wikipedia. Although they are enforcing a policy not to cite Wikipedia, they are not outright banning the use of it because you can get good information on the website.                                              

Wikipedia officials even agree that "There is no guarantee an article is 100% correct," (Jaschik, 45). This is in a large part because anybody can write their own or edit someone else's article.

Middlebury College believes that Wikipedia is an inappropriate source for two reasons. One. the accuracy is not guaranteed and there is an issue with whether it is a reliable source. Two, encyclopedias themselves are not appropriate sources for college students because at this level of learning a student is expected to cite primary sources or strong secondary sources.


What you should take out of this blog is the recognition that although Wikipedia is convenient, it is not a reliable source. In this article they discuss what goes in to making Wikipedia articles, and how the types of people who contribute greatly reflect the quality of the article.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Inequality in Blogging

According to Dustin Harp and Mark Tremayne in their essay "The Gendered Blogosphere: Examining Inequality Using Network and Feminist Theory" men dominate the blog scene online. They say that the blogs receiving the most links are disproportionately male. When a blog has more links it gets more attention on higher levels, such as more attention from mainstream media and political elites. However, the percentages of male to female blog authors are not far apart (57% men 43% female). The argument that far less women are online is also not true because 61% of women and 66% of men use the internet, fairly close.

They suggest that the blogosphere is not unlike the social interactions that have shaped cultures elsewhere. It is also important to point out that negative social and political aspects of the real world will continue in the virtual world as well. This is because the internet will become a place for the powerful to flourish and the powerless to have little voice.



It is true that the internet offers an arena for feminists to express their beliefs, but we must also be aware of its limitations. The internet has limitations because women are still seen as part of a private life of home, private relations, and having a family while men are seen as having a responsibility to the public through government and commercial establishments. Limitations are also seen by studies that show that women are less likely to express political opinions and have a less authoritative style in their conversations.

On the contrary, sites like http://feministblogs.org give women the opportunity to blog openly in a "malestream" media. Through the observations I have made I would like you to be aware of the inequality on the web, instead of viewing it as totally free speech.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

How Paul Levinson Categorizes New New Media

For this blog post I plan to discuss how Paul Levinson author of "New New Media" defines and categorizes new new media. Levinson says that "'New New Media' is about the advent and impact of media newer than 'new' media- as different from the classic new media of email and websites as those new media are different from old media such as newspapers and television" (Levinson 1). His current roster of new media includes blogging, YouTube, Wikipedia, Digg, MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, Second Life and Podcasts.

One of the ways he discusses new new media in the first chapter is to categorize it. I believe this is helpful to know because how could Wikipedia and Facebook be described under the same category of new new media when they are so different.

The first Category is "Print, Audio, Audio-Visual, Photographic". This category applies to YouTube because Audio-Visual media in the form of videos characterize it. This also, in a completely different light, applies to Second Life because you are moving virtual avatars through which users can speak. This category also obviously applies to podcasting (audio), video casting (audio-visual), and Flickr/ Photobucket (Photography).

The next Category is "News" which strictly describes "the purpose, not the media form, of the new new medium" (Levinson 5). Wikipedia and Digg would fall under this category because their chief purpose is to inform. YouTube can also be under this category because it contains many news worthy videos. Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter also contain news.

Another Category he uses is "Social Media" which describes all new new media because all new new media is inherently social. Levinson gives social examples of commenting on blogs or videos, but the main forms of social new new media are, of course, Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter.

Levinson also has "General vs. Specific" as a category which describes blogging, podcasting, vidcasting, and social media as general new new media applications, and YouTube, Wikipedia, and Digg as specific.  A general application can and do exist on live online sites devoted to many applications such as podcasting, blogging, social media, and other new new media opportunities. While specific systems are primarily devoted to just one application ex: YouTube (videos).

"Politics and Entertainment" have a category because given the democratization of New New Media production, you can find almost anything on any topic on a blog or a social network. This category gives the example of how Barack Obama used many new new media forums to aid him with his campaign, which caused him, among other things, to receive popularity from college voters.

"New New Media and Government Control" also have a category because it tells us how new new media has also run in to problems with government control just as new media and old media have. In this article Iran's government shut down Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and cell phones in an attempt to lessen the riots after the election.

The next category is "Microblogging and Blogging". This category describes the difference between short twitter posts and Facebook and MySpace status updates with the normal length blogs found on sites like Blogger. The short posts make for a more personal communication because with new new media today the shorter the better.

The final category I will discuss today is "Hardware vs. Software -iPhone, BlackBerry, Laptop". Levinson has this as a category because he wants to stress the importance of how we consider the hardware that brings new new media to us.  Are we searching Wikipedia on a lap top or tweeting on our iPhone? With mobile media you can tweet or update your status at a moments notice.

As I end this blog I wish to apologize for it's excessive length for new new media, as stressed in the "blogging/ microblogging" category is meant to be more brief. However, I found that it was important to look at the categories of new new media so we can better understand what is actually considered new new media.